🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action is part of a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican control. Usually, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading House figure stated the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.